cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
refers into a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a effectively-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
Life imprisonment is undoubtedly an alternative into the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life at the rear of bars.
Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends about the specifics of every case, like any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed from the respondent/Institute, these rules may not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework on the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what has actually been discussed earlier mentioned, without touching the merits of the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of your petition is sustained and the petition is held to be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio from the judgment passed because of the Supreme Court within the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of your Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to some person causes death of this sort of person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is alleged to commit qatl-i-khata.”
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is place in its place.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden given to any reported judgment may well rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence and also the separation of powers.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and likely hazard to local residents. In the end, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, while observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have destructive effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out more info in the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.